Draft environmental review released
We determined the Flood District’s proposed project could have significant adverse environmental impacts. Our draft state Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analyzed how the proposal is likely to affect the environment under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). More details are below and our focus sheet has an overview of the findings of the draft EIS.
There are multiple ways to provide comments on the draft EIS and we will consider all comments equally, regardless of how they are submitted. Comments can be submitted online. They can also be mailed to:
SEPA Draft EIS for Chehalis Flood Damage Reduction Project
c/o Anchor QEA
1201 Third Ave., Suite 2600
Seattle, WA 98101
Verbal comments can be submitted during online events on April 2 and April 21. We switched to online opportunities to protect public health during the COVID-19 outbreak while ensuring the public has multiple ways to comment.
Both April public comment events will begin at 5 p.m. with a 45-minute presentation. Starting at about 5:45 p.m., we will take public comment through the webinar until 8:30 p.m. To help ensure everyone has a chance to comment, participants will be limited to 2 minutes each.
Register online to participate
To comment during the upcoming online events, participants will need to register separately for the April 2 public hearing and for the April 21 public meeting. Registration can be done in advance or at the time of the events. We've provided a graphic to help participants register for the online public comment opportunities.
Flood District's proposed project
The Flood District's flood retention dam and associated temporary reservoir is intended to reduce damages from major floods from Pe Ell to Centralia triggered by rainfall in the Willapa Hills. The airport levee changes would raise and widen the Chehalis-Centralia Airport levee and nearby roads to increase the levee protection level during catastrophic floods. The project is not intended to address flooding in all parts of the Chehalis River basin and would not stop regular annual flooding.
See proposed project images:
Relationship to Chehalis Basin Strategy
Communities in the basin are working with the Chehalis Basin Board on a long-term strategy to reduce flood damage and restore aquatic habitat. One part of the Chehalis Basin Strategy is to consider large-scale flood damage reduction actions. The Flood District's project evaluated in the draft environmental review is one of the proposed actions for consideration. The Board is expected to use the information in the environmental review, along with other information, to inform their recommendations for the long-term strategy.
Study identifies significant environmental impacts
Our review studied the likely significant environmental impacts from the Flood District’s project as well as alternatives. We looked at 17 different environmental elements including impacts to air quality, cultural resources, environmental health and safety, environmental justice, fish and aquatic species, habitat and land use, recreation, transportation, tribal resources, water, wetlands, and wildlife.
Under our analysis, the project would reduce flooding to buildings and infrastructure, including U.S. Interstate 5. It would have significant adverse effects, mainly along the Chehalis River in the area above the flood retention dam and below it to the confluence with the South Fork of the Chehalis River. These include:
- Reducing spring- and fall-run Chinook salmon, Coho salmon, and steelhead trout.
- Reducing native aquatic species such as lamprey and mussels.
- Reducing wildlife such as amphibians.
- Degrading habitat on land, and in water and wetlands.
- Degrading river and stream water quality.
- Eliminating access for recreational fishing and whitewater boating.
- Increasing greenhouse gas emissions.
- Impacting tribal and cultural resources.
Several impacts from the proposal would be unavoidable unless measures to offset them are determined to be feasible and meet regulatory requirements. This would be determined during future permitting processes including local and tribal governments, and state and federal agencies.
Should the project move forward, there are nearly 40 local, state, and federal authorizations, approvals, and permits that would be needed.
EIS analysis integrates climate change
Climate change will drive more frequent floods, higher flood levels, and would put native fish runs at higher risk in the future, absent significant restoration efforts. We integrated climate change in our analysis of future conditions where the proposed flood retention dam would operate.
Project alternatives analyzed
In addition to the proposed project, the EIS also analyzed what is known as a "no action" alternative. This examines what would happen if the flood retention facility is not built or no improvements are made to the airport levee. The study also analyzed an alternative based on localized and nonstructural actions that could help retain flood waters and reduce flood-related damage.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a separate but synchronized federal review of the district's proposal under the National Environmental Policy Act. The federal draft review is planned to be released in September 2020.
Summary available of state EIS scoping
Scoping is the first step in the state and federal environmental review process. From Sept. 28 through Oct. 29, 2018, we and the Corps of Engineers held a joint SEPA-NEPA EIS scoping period—including two public hearings—to receive input regarding the scope of the state EIS. The SEPA EIS Scoping Summary Report provides a summary of scoping comments and outreach.