New toxic air pollutant emissions from commercial and industrial businesses may require a permit. We manage a health-based toxic air pollutant control program that regulates about 400 toxic air pollutants. We use three levels of review to make sure that the new emissions will not cause health effects.
We review emissions of toxic air pollutants from new or modified stationary air pollution sources. This review is part of the Notice of Construction permit process.
The purpose of the health impact review is to prevent air pollution by controlling emissions of toxic air pollutants from new sources, to reduce toxic emissions as much as possible, and maintain healthy air quality.
There are up to three levels of review for making permit decisions about projects that emit toxic air pollutants.
First tier review
Most new projects only need a first tier review (toxic screening) before getting a permit. First tier review compares the expected level of toxic air pollutants to established health-based acceptable source impact levels (ASILs). If the estimated impacts are less than the acceptable source impact levels, then health risks are considered insignificant and the clean air agency might issue a permit.
Second tier review
Some projects — like data centers — require a second tier review that includes a health impact assessment. If a project emits more of a toxic air pollutant than is allowed by the ASIL, then the applicant must submit a health impact assessment. This review determines the increase in lifetime cancer risk and other health effects for people who are exposed to increased amounts of the toxic air pollutant from the proposed project. The cancer and health risks are then compared to the maximum risk allowed by a second tier review to see if they are within allowable limits.
Third tier review
Third tier review is rarely needed. If the emissions of a toxic air pollutant result in a risk higher than allowed by the second tier review, a business can ask Ecology to perform a third tier review. We decide whether the risk of the project is acceptable based on:
- Whether available preventive measures can reduce emissions enough to protect human health.
- What the estimated environmental benefits are.
- Public input received at a public hearing and related community feedback about a proposed facility.