Revised draft environmental review of proposed Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Project

Providing public comments

We have opened a 75-day public comment period for the revised draft environmental impact statement. We will accept comments through Feb. 4, 2026, by regular mail, online, in person at a public hearing, or virtually through Zoom.

What happens once the comment period ends?

We will review and consider the comments we receive and prepare a final environmental impact statement for the proposed project. We will weigh all comments equally, regardless of the source.

We anticipate publishing a final environmental impact statement for the project in 2026. The final study will inform permit decisions for the proposed project. Local governments and state and federal agencies may issue applicable permits for the project seven days after we publish the final environmental impact statement. If the project moves forward, the Flood District anticipates starting construction in 2030.

Background

The Flood District originally proposed the flood damage reduction project with a different design a few years ago. We conducted a draft environmental review of the original design and held a public comment period in 2020. However, in the five years since our first draft environmental review, the Flood District changed the location, design and construction details for its proposal, and resubmitted an updated proposal to us in April 2024. We determined the changes were significant enough to warrant a revised draft environmental impact statement for the project. 

The revised draft environmental impact statement does not compare the two designs and only looks at the new design, its potential environmental impacts and possible measures to mitigate or offset the impacts. 

What the revised draft environmental study found

Overall findings

We used scientific models to help understand, test and predict how the proposed project would impact the environment. We found there would be adverse environmental impacts at the site of the dam structure, in the temporary reservoir area and in areas downstream of the proposed dam during construction and operation. 

The revised draft environmental impact statement found constructing and operating the flow-through dam and temporary reservoir would significantly and negatively impact fish and wildlife as well as aquatic and land habitats, recreation, earth, water, transportation, wetlands, land use, Tribal resources, cultural resources, environmental health and safety, environmental justice, and public services and utilities. 

Summary of findings

Fish

Our modeling data shows the proposed flow-through dam facility would adversely impact salmon and steelhead trout populations, especially near the structure. Our modeling also predicts climate change will continue to cause salmon and steelhead trout populations in the Chehalis River basin to decline, and the proposed dam is likely to magnify these adverse impacts.

Modeling also predicts the proposed project would reduce the genetic diversity within and among spring- and fall-run Chinook salmon runs as well as coho and chum salmon populations in 3,400-square-mile Chehalis River drainage system. We would also see significant adverse impacts to steelhead trout, lamprey, mountain whitefish, freshwater mussels, amphibians and macroinvertebrates such as insects, worms, snails and crayfish.

Tribal and cultural resources

Based on available information, the proposed project would significantly impact Tribal cultural and natural resources.

Wildlife

The project would also result in significant impacts on wildlife species, their habitats and associated vegetation during construction and operation. Once operational, the proposed dam structure and associated temporary reservoir would block migratory pathways for wildlife.

Earth

We found landslide risks around the temporary reservoir area. The project would also result in changes to the river channel and movement of sediment.

Water

We found the proposed project would reduce the amount of streamside vegetation and shade cover along the Chehalis River and streams near the project. This would degrade area water quality by raising stream temperatures and reducing dissolved oxygen levels. In addition, the project would eliminate peak downstream flows that are critical for forming natural channels that help slow down flood waters and create habitat areas for fish and other aquatic life.

The project would also reduce conditions favorable for replenishing large woody debris in basin rivers and streams. Large woody debris helps slow erosion and provides habitat areas for salmon and other aquatic species. In addition, wetlands, streams and their buffers would be significantly impacted due to activities to construct the dam and by operating the temporary reservoir.

Federal environmental review process also underway

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a separate federal review of the Flood District’s proposal under the National Environmental Policy Act. We will continue to coordinate with the Flood District, other state agencies and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during the review although the SEPA and NEPA processes will remain separate and on different schedules.

Details about the Flood District's proposed project

The Flood District’s proposed project entails building a unique flow-through dam and associated temporary reservoir on the Chehalis River near the town of Pe Ell and making changes to the Chehalis-Centralia Airport levee. 

Under the Flood District’s proposal, the Chehalis River would flow freely through the dam structure unless a catastrophic or major flood occurs in the upper Chehalis River basin, triggered by heavy precipitation in the Willapa Hills. The dam would then close its gates to temporarily hold back flood waters to reduce flood-related damage from Pe Ell to Centralia. Water would be safely released later. The project is not intended to address flooding in all parts of the Chehalis River basin and would not stop regular annual flooding.

What changes were made to the original project proposal?

The Flood District made several key changes to its original proposal, in response to our findings in the 2020 draft environmental impact statement including: 

• Moving the dam structure about 1,000 feet upstream from its original location.
• Revising plans allowing fish to pass through the site before and after construction.
• Submitting a plan to manage vegetation.
• Identifying new construction quarry sites and updated information about roads proposed to be used during dam construction.
• Making minor updates to the proposed airport levee portion of the project.
• Draft mitigation plans addressing how adverse environmental impacts from the proposal could be offset.

Does the revised draft study have a connection to the Chehalis Basin Strategy

The independent Chehalis Basin Board is leading the development of the Chehalis Basin Strategy—the long-term action plan for reducing flood damage and restoring salmon and other aquatic life in the Chehalis River basin. The board is considering a combination of projects and investments and is working on recommendations to present to the Washington Legislature in 2026 to move the strategy forward. The board will consider the information in our environmental review as they make decisions about the long-term strategy. 

Climate change integrated into findings 

We integrated climate change in our analysis of future conditions for the location where the proposed flood retention dam would operate. Unless Washington sees significant restoration efforts, climate change will drive more frequent floods, higher flood levels, and would put native fish runs at higher risk in the future. 

Revised, draft study also analyzes two other alternatives

In addition to the proposed project, our revised draft environmental impact statement also analyzed what is known as a "no action" alternative. This analysis examines what would happen if the applicant doesn’t build the flood retention facility, or if we don’t see any improvements made to the airport levee. The study also analyzed a “local actions” alternative based on localized and nonstructural actions that could help retain floodwaters and reduce flood-related damage.

SEPA findings, administrative process questions