Washington's wetlands vary widely in their functions and values. Some types are common while others are rare. Some are heavily disturbed while others are still relatively undisturbed. All, however, provide some wetland functions and resources that are valued. These may be ecological, economic, recreational, or aesthetic.
To protect individual wetlands effectively, managers, planners, and citizens need tools to understand the resource value each wetland provides. The rating systems were designed to differentiate between wetlands based on:
- Sensitivity to disturbance
- Our ability to replace them
- Functions they provide
The rating systems group wetlands into four categories.
In 2014, we updated the Washington State Wetland Rating Systems for both Eastern and Western Washington. The 2014 publications marked the third update for the rating system for Eastern Washington and the fourth update for Western Washington since 1991.
The 2014 rating systems took effect Jan. 1, 2015. This means you are required to use the 2014 updates for projects needing our authorization.
Applicants applying for a local permit need to consult with each specific city or county government regarding their critical areas ordinance (CAO). If a CAO contains the language “2004 rating system or as revised,” the applicant will likely need to use the 2014 updates to address local government requirements. Some local jurisdictions may have language in their CAO that requires the use of the earlier 2004 rating systems. This means we will keep the 2004 versions available electronically.
The rating systems are primarily intended for use with vegetated, freshwater wetlands identified using the federal delineation manual and regional supplements. The rating system also categorizes estuarine wetlands but does not characterize their functions.
The “rating” categories are intended to be used as the basis for developing standards for protecting and managing wetlands to reduce further loss of their value. Wetland rating can help you decide:
- The width of buffers needed to protect the wetland from adjacent development.
- The amount of mitigation needed to compensate for impacts to the wetland.
- Permitted uses in the wetland.
We have developed recommendations for standards in volume two of our best available science report.
Using the rating system for compensatory mitigation planning
The rating systems don't replace a full assessment of wetland functions that may be necessary to plan and monitor a compensatory mitigation project.
The rating systems should not be used to estimate the changes in the functions of wetlands as a result of impacts or mitigation. We have developed a separate tool to address this issue called the Credit/Debit Method.