Paired watershed retrofit & restoration study
The City of Redmond led this 10 year study to understand how large scale stormwater retrofits affected small urban streams. Seven watersheds in and around Redmond were monitored for hydrology, water quality, habitat, and biological indicators. There are three watershed types in this study design:
- Three application watersheds: Evans, Monticello, and Tosh
- Two reference watersheds: Colin and Seidel
- Two control watersheds: Country and Tyler's
Application watersheds will undergo large-scale retrofits to bring the watershed into current Washington stormwater management standards. Control watersheds will progress at a normal timeline of development. Reference watersheds will not develop as they are in relatively protected environments.
Study question
- How effective are watershed-scale rehabilitation efforts at improving conditions for small stream receiving waters?
Scope of work
The monitoring in this study ran from 2015 to 2025. Because of its length, only major tasks and deliverables are summarized here.
Planning and preparation
- Literature review for monitoring approaches and key indicators
- Experimental design
- Quality Assurance Project Plan
- Purchase and installation of monitoring equipment
Study findings
- SAM Fact Sheet #6 (April 2018): Status Update
- SAM Fact Sheet #23 (April 2021): Interim Findings - 2016 to 2019
- SAM Fact Sheet #38 (Oct 2025): Interim Findings Update - 2016 to 2023
- SAM Fact Sheet #41 (Aug 2026): Street Sweeping Study
Water Year Data Reports
Each year, this study produced a data report that summarized all monitoring results collected during the previous water year (October through September). These reports also documented any data quality issues and noted how those issues affected data use or interpretation. They also described the rehabilitation work completed by the City of Redmond or King County during that year.
Water and sediment chemistry data are stored in Ecology’s Environmental Information Management (EIM) system and made available under study ID RSM_EFS1. Flow and temperature data are available by searching “RPWS” on King County Hydrologic Information Center website.The appendices in the annual reports include several incremental deliverables, such as hydrologic summaries, King County’s data quality assurance reviews, water quality summaries, and sediment quality summaries.
- Water Year 2016 Data Report (Oct 2015–Sept 2016)
- Water Year 2017 Data Report (Oct 2016–Sept 2017)
- Water Year 2018 Data Report (Oct 2017–Sept 2018)
- Water Year 2019 Data Report (Oct 2018–Sept 2019)
- Hydrologic Indicator Reporting Errata (Oct 2015–Sept 2019)
- Water Year 2020 Data Report (Oct 2019–Sept 2020)
- Water Year 2021 Data Report (Oct 2020–Sept 2021)
- Water Year 2022 Data Report (Oct 2021–Sept 2022)
- Water Year 2023 Data Report (Oct 2022–Sept 2023)
- Water Year 2024 Data Report (Oct 2023–Sept 2024)
- Water Year 2025 Data Report (Oct 2024–Sept 2025)
Trend Reports
In years 4, 8, and 10 of the study, trend analysis reports to go along with the annual data reports were produced. These reports summarized statistical analyses of all monitoring data collected up to that point. The purpose was to look for long‑term patterns and identify whether completed rehabilitation work was associated with changes in receiving water conditions. Each trend report presents the major findings and conclusions from these analyses.
- Trend Analysis Report: Water Years 2016–2019
- Trend Analysis Report: Water Years 2016–2023
- Trend Analysis Report: Water Years 2016–2025
Pond retrofit sub-study
Street sweeping sub-study
Contact information
Chelsea Morris
Stormwater Action Monitoring Scientist
chelsea.morris@ecy.wa.gov
564-999-3052